At the practical level people should be able to make honest sense of betrayal and also to temper its consequences: to handle it, not be assaulted by it. Philosophers should be able to clarify the concept of betrayal, compare and contrast it with other moral concepts, and critically assess betrayal situations. Jackson explains why a clear definition is needed:īetrayal is both a "people" problem and a philosopher's problem. Philosophers Judith Shklar and Peter Johnson, authors of The Ambiguities of Betrayal and Frames of Deceit, respectively, contend that while no clear definition of betrayal is available, betrayal is more effectively understood through literature. Betrayal is also a commonly used literary element, also used in other fiction like films and TV series, and is often associated with or used as a plot twist. Someone who betrays others is commonly called a traitor or betrayer.
Often betrayal is the act of supporting a rival group, or it is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others. For other uses, see Betrayer (disambiguation).īetrayal is the breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations.
0 kommentar(er)
